Friday, April 25, 2008

Why Kill Time When You Can Kill Yourself?

Over at David Silver's blog you can read about what happens when media studies students retreat to Melinda Stone's farm, and there are links to what Amber, LuLu & Sara had to say about the experience, too.

So you're in line at a cafe & you order a sandwich & a latte. How many times do you have to say medium decaf and how many times do you have to say mustard no mayo with avacado? Let's switch the question: when did you last get exactly what you asked for without having to repeat something?

Say what? We said: without having to repeat something.

You're in a cab. You assume, as you tell the cabbie where you want to go, that you will have to repeat this information at least once. It would be too much, in this world, to expect anyone to take in important data the first time around. It needs to sort of seep in, after several iterations, because the cabbie is -- a) on the phone; b) listening to the radio; c) watching the pretty girls; d) thinking about anything or anyone but you.

In our POP ARTS class students recently retreated from all media for 2-3 days & then wrote about that, partly in response to Thomas de Zengotita's article The Numbing Of The American Mind. Many students found this to be a real challenge, and the prof's experience of reading papers like this (an idea he stole many years ago from Prof. Michelle Wolf at San Francisco State University -- hi Michelle!) is that it is becoming increasingly difficult for students to -- a) isolate themselves from media input; and b) deal with the aloneness that results.

Recently on MSNBC a debate between Hillary Clinton & Barack Obama devoted a mere 16 minutes to the all-important topic of health care (is anything, ultimately, more important than this?) and host/presenter Brian Williams made a point, as he moved on after 16 minutes, to note what an extraordinary amount of time had been given over to the discussion (which was not in fact over).

Why do we have to move on? (Because it's time for a commercial break.) Why could we not talk about health care for another 16 minutes? (Because people might get bored.) Isn't life and death important enough? (Apparently not.) And if life & death is not important enough, then what is? (Whatever the next thing is, that's the most important thing.)

So you're in class and you make an announcement about office hours or whatever and anyway it's all in the syllabus, and you say the same things over & over & over again, and still there are questions like, when are your office hours again?

Students make appointments with you but then about half the time they do not show up.

The prof is not exempt. On Wednesday of this week he arrived in class with the wrong DVD. A first! Awful. But now we are all absent-minded professors, somehow it seemed easier to get away with the mistake. Appalling!

Sorry, what was that again?
Oh, we screwed up on Wednesday.

Whatever.

We cannot escape mediation. It is a product of the division of labour. We depend upon this division of labour in order to maintain a global industrial economy, absent which millions more people will starve. And -- more importantly -- could not have cell phones or MTV. And since we cannot reverse history then we will have to determine some way to be mindful of our lives while we are dancing in the distraction factory. That's where we live.

Important always to remember that (mass)mediation, like writing, music & art, is also social connection. It's not the technology, stupid. It's how you use it. And which toys you choose. The prof says: blogging good, iPods bad.

Not everyone agrees with him.

17 comments:

Tmorahan said...
This post has been removed by the author.
david silver said...

nice post.

we need to find a way to allow our students to share their ideas on their three-day-less-mediated-then before experiences.

Andrew said...

David, that's what I was thinking too. Furthermore, we need to talk, as profs, about how to cope with what TdZ calls The Flood. And how to help our students navigate that. I think there is a lot of unnecessary guild about time spent on-line etc. Being in nature is great (and congrats on an exciting project at the farm) but oe can also be mindful at the 'pewter, surely?

Holly said...

Good stuff! This makes me think a bit more about my current work on non-ambient screens. (And also, just about saying "hi, Andrew!")

Professor Of Pop said...

Non-ambient screens?

Professor Of Pop said...

Non-ambient screens?

Professor Of Pop said...

Non-ambient screens?

Holly said...

Public screens that people are present to attend to, as opposed to the "ambient" television about which Anna McCarthy wrote: public television monitors to which people don't fully attend to. My research was done in/on horse racing off-track betting facilities.

Professor Of Pop said...

Well that's a help, but I know at least 3 Hollys, so I am still trying to figure out which one is you!

Holly said...

Holly Kruse

Professor Of Pop said...

Hi Holly! Yeah, those non-ambient screens are a factor. When I first stole this exercise (from Michelle Wolf at SFSU) there was a distinction between public/private media use that seems no longer to be valid.

Holly said...

And I may be missing out on some research I should be reading (I'm sure I am!), but in all that I've been reading about the ubiquity of small, semi-private, closely attended-to, screens in public (iPhones and other smart phones, for instance), as well as the ubiquity of ambient public screens, and with the multiplicity of monitors variously attended to in the home, no one seems to discussion the relationships between these sorts of screens and the "old" tech of the movie theatre screen. I would love to read something on that.

Professor Of Pop said...

Holly, I am going to send this discussion in the direction of our Film Studies maven Prof Melinda Stone -- it's an intriguing question you ask...

Holly said...

Cool!

melinda said...

Holly, I don't think I can help you with any academic articles or books about the small public screen phenomenon, but I do believe there is discussion of it in the trade papers - variety etc. There was a great piece in the New Yorker last spring that addressed the shift in viewing habits related to film.

Michelle said...

Hi back at you Andrew!

Michelle said...

Hi back at you Andrew!